Menu
Automotive News Updates

Opinion: Why F1 wants clearer requirements | Autocar

  • Share

[ad_1]

Maybe simply as essential, there must be extra clear communication about why sure strikes are or aren’t penalised. Clearly, no two incidents are the identical, so explaining stewards’ choices correctly would assist to quell speak about inconsistent penalties and make F1 simpler to comply with. 

The important thing, although, is that even when there are penalties given, they shouldn’t distract from the motion on the monitor. 

The way it works: wing flex in Method 1

Flexing rear and entrance wings have been a reason behind competition in Method 1 for many years, and this yr they’ve been again on the agenda, with Purple Bull and Mercedes-AMG insinuating that the opposite is bending the principles to cut back aerodynamic drag on straights. 

It’s acknowledged within the technical rules that aerodynamic elements should “stay motionless in relation to the sprung a part of the automobile”, and the FIA has load and deflection assessments in order to strictly police tolerances. These have been made extra stringent this yr after complaints emerged about Purple Bull, after which at Interlagos Max Verstappen copped a €50,000 wonderful for fidgeting with the rear wing of Lewis Hamilton’s Mercedes in parc fermé. The explanation? Purple Bull suspects that Mercedes is falling foul of the flex guidelines. 

It’s an previous trick that received’t be going away any time quickly. However till a automobile fails the FIA assessments, they’re all authorized…

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink

0
  • Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.