Menu
Automotive News Updates

Opinion: How prescient was the Rolls-Royce 102EX? | Autocar

  • Share

[ad_1]

When Rolls-Royce constructed the Phantom-based 102EX in 2011, it appeared a really curious challenge.

No purchaser had requested for such a automobile and no manufacturing mannequin was deliberate. Although we would not realize it for one more decade, the dual-motor structure would go on to turn out to be broadly adopted by rivals, and its 71kWh battery could be surprisingly shut to the everyday capability of a contemporary premium EV.

On the time although, an electrical Curler appeared like a good distance away from being something apart from a proof of idea. 

Now the challenge may be very actual.

An electrical Rolls will likely be on sale by mid-decade, and it’s sure to exhibit the extent of EV progress made since 2011.

It’s prone to have a twin-motor, all-wheel drive set-up, fairly than the 102EX’s rear drive. Energy ought to comfortably be double that of the 102EX’s 390bhp, which was noticeably down on the marque’s modern V12 (albeit with larger peak torque).

Its lithium ion battery won’t weigh far more than the prototype’s 640kg one, however know-how advances will increase its capability effectively past 71kWh, maybe into the 120kWh area.

This and different measures could be anticipated to double the cruising vary from an unexceptional 124 miles, though Rolls-Royce will probably insist its first EV is for short-haul use.

Extra spectacular would be the discount in charging occasions. Whereas the 102EX relied on three separate 3kW chargers and wanted at the very least eight hours to completely recharge, the most recent EVs help 350kW ultra-rapid charging that might handle the identical in half an hour.

However there will likely be one main similarity between the 102EX and the brand new manufacturing automobile: tremendous refinement, first described in Autocar as ‘waftability’, would be the high precedence.

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink

0
  • Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.